+- Frictional Games Forum (read-only) (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Frictional Games (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Off-Topic (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-16.html)
+--- Thread: Cpu question (/thread-16659.html)
RE: Cpu question - Your Computer - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 07:55 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: i have this in mind ASUS S1155 Z68 DDR3 SATA6 USB3 BT ATX. does this have it, sorry i am completey noob on this.
The Z68 does support the integrated graphics controller; P67 does not.
RE: Cpu question - Red - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:00 PM)Your Computer Wrote:But whats the idea of having integrated graphics in Cpu, could it possibly boost the Graphics cards GPU? Or is it only for integrated graphics?(07-01-2012, 07:55 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: i have this in mind ASUS S1155 Z68 DDR3 SATA6 USB3 BT ATX. does this have it, sorry i am completey noob on this.
The Z68 does support the integrated graphics controller; P67 does not.
Sorry for my wierd questions
RE: Cpu question - Your Computer - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:03 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: But is there an idea of having integrated controller anyway, could it boost the Graphics card GPU? Or is it only for integrated graphics?
Sorry for my wierd questions
In practice it is better to get a discrete graphics card than to use the one on the CPU, since the one in the CPU is generally weaker. The one on the CPU is better as a back-up GPU or if you can make use of Intel QuickSync. Using third-party programs (e.g. Lucid Virtu) to create a hybrid between the discrete graphics card and the one in the CPU is normally not practical, as it tends to cause issues.
RE: Cpu question - Red - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:12 PM)Your Computer Wrote:i see, it would be good for secondary graphics, if discrete card could be broken, right?(07-01-2012, 08:03 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: But is there an idea of having integrated controller anyway, could it boost the Graphics card GPU? Or is it only for integrated graphics?
Sorry for my wierd questions
In practice it is better to get a discrete graphics card than to use the one on the CPU, since the one in the CPU is generally weaker. The one on the CPU is better as a back-up GPU or if you can make use of Intel QuickSync. Using third-party programs (e.g. Lucid Virtu) to create a hybrid between the discrete graphics card and the one in the CPU is normally not practical, as it tends to cause issues.
Anyway thanks for the effort, i appriciate that.
EDIT:Ohh what am i messing, i didn`t read the whole answer.
And an another question to line, is there better graphics card than this Asus hd7850-dc2-2gd5
for the ~300€ price?
RE: Cpu question - Kreekakon - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:18 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: And an another question to line, is there better graphics card than this Asus hd7850-dc2-2gd5I don't think so. That graphics card is already peaking the top of extremity. If you get your hands on something like that, chances are you won't be needing to do a tech switch for another three or four years lol
for the ~300€ price?
RE: Cpu question - Red - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:40 PM)Kreekakon Wrote:Yeah, but i have a concern about it`s cooling http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/Review/298465,asus-hd-7850-direct-cu-ii---good-overclocker-terrible-cooler-choice.aspx(07-01-2012, 08:18 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: And an another question to line, is there better graphics card than this Asus hd7850-dc2-2gd5I don't think so. That graphics card is already peaking the top of extremity. If you get your hands on something like that, chances are you won't be needing to do a tech switch for another three or four years lol
for the ~300€ price?
RE: Cpu question - Your Computer - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:18 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: And an another question to line, is there better graphics card than this Asus hd7850-dc2-2gd5
for the ~300€ price?
For ~300€, the 7950 would be it.
RE: Cpu question - Kreekakon - 07-01-2012
Quote:Yeah, but i have a concern about it`s cooling http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/Review/298465,asus-hd-7850-direct-cu-ii---good-overclocker-terrible-cooler-choice.aspxWell, in that case I'd suggest you go for something with 6 or 7 as its model number's second digit...that is if you know what I mean.
These models while not as powerful as 8 or 9s in the same class, they consume much less power, are much quieter, and are generally loads more stable.
RE: Cpu question - Red - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:51 PM)Kreekakon Wrote:But i think getting 7850 still, if i don`t overclock itQuote:Yeah, but i have a concern about it`s cooling http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/Review/298465,asus-hd-7850-direct-cu-ii---good-overclocker-terrible-cooler-choice.aspxWell, in that case I'd suggest you go for something with 6 or 7 as its model number's second digit...that is if you know what I mean.
These models while not as powerful as 8 or 9s in the same class, they consume much less power, are much quieter, and are generally loads more stable.
(07-01-2012, 08:50 PM)Your Computer Wrote:but when i google that model i get about ~360e or the review is low.(07-01-2012, 08:18 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: And an another question to line, is there better graphics card than this Asus hd7850-dc2-2gd5
for the ~300€ price?
For ~300€, the 7950 would be it.
RE: Cpu question - Kreekakon - 07-01-2012
(07-01-2012, 08:57 PM)Pyöveli Wrote: But i think getting 7850 still, if i don`t overclock itFrankly speaking though, I don't think you'll often be in need of overclocking that card at all.