+- Frictional Games Forum (read-only) (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Amnesia: The Dark Descent (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Custom Stories, TCs & Mods - Development (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-38.html)
+--- Thread: [Amnesia] Screenshot criticism thread (/thread-11760.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Wapez - 08-08-2014
(08-08-2014, 10:37 PM)Robosprog Wrote: If it was your bad dude, best thing is to apologize to those who you reacted so harshly too.
I don't think I was harsh to anyone but endo. And that wasn't really about what was in my shot.
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Wapez - 08-08-2014
My response wasn't the best but you can't ask for more after his first comment to the screenshots.
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Wapez - 08-08-2014
(08-08-2014, 11:10 PM)Robosprog Wrote: Seriously, there was no reason to respond the way you did. If anything, that was more reasonable than the way I put it.
I didn't say he wasn't reasonable. Just that he was cocky. Which I think he was.
Also:
endosine Wrote:FUCKER
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Gilligan's Hell - 08-08-2014
(08-08-2014, 11:14 PM)Wapez Wrote:(08-08-2014, 11:10 PM)Robosprog Wrote: Seriously, there was no reason to respond the way you did. If anything, that was more reasonable than the way I put it.
I didn't say he wasn't reasonable. Just that he was cocky. Which I think he was.
Also:
endosine Wrote:FUCKER
Okay if you've actually read the posts before, it was a response to the Arch picture sprogrobo (different user) posted... its a running joke, thats why i simply said FUCKER... it wasnt directed at you.
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Newsman Waterpaper - 08-08-2014
(08-08-2014, 11:18 PM)endosine Wrote:Stop reading my script!(08-08-2014, 11:14 PM)Wapez Wrote:(08-08-2014, 11:10 PM)Robosprog Wrote: Seriously, there was no reason to respond the way you did. If anything, that was more reasonable than the way I put it.
I didn't say he wasn't reasonable. Just that he was cocky. Which I think he was.
Also:
endosine Wrote:FUCKER
Okay if you've actually read the posts before, it was a response to the Arch picture sprogrobo (different user) posted... its a running joke, thats why i simply said FUCKER... it wasnt directed at you.
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Wapez - 08-08-2014
Ah, I see. Well, it doesn't really change the situation.
Also I don't think I was unreasonable. Look, all I did was ask him not to be cocky because I felt like there was supposed to be a lot of irony in that first post that was meant to in some way make me look bad. Then he comes flying at me with a lot of stuff that was really mean. I won't apologize, because I don't see me doing something wrong. I do understand your way of thinking - I just don't agree.
EDIT: I just hope I didn't make you sad endo, I never intended to, no matter what you meant with your first post.
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Newsman Waterpaper - 08-08-2014
(08-08-2014, 11:22 PM)Wapez Wrote: Ah, I see. Well, it doesn't really change the situation.
Yeah but why you quoted the "FUCKER" post anyway....
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Wapez - 08-08-2014
(08-08-2014, 11:25 PM)Newsman Waterpaper Wrote: Yeah but why you quoted the "FUCKER" post anyway....
Misunderstanding. Sorry about that.
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - Wapez - 08-08-2014
(08-08-2014, 11:28 PM)Robosprog Wrote: You were unreasonable, dude. It's not a matter of opinion, it's objective - you had a completely unreasonable response to what he posted.
And honestly, if you think that, it's just paranoia. It was him calling you out, on what he thought, to be you copying an FG map. There was no message between the lines - sometimes, you do have to take things at face value.
And yeah, of course he does - he retaliated towards you doing the exact thing. Honestly dude, you were in the wrong here, there are usually shades of grey for everything but I just don't see any - just a very strong black.
It's incredibly juvenile to be honest, not to just apologize and let it go. You might apply the same to me and say to just leave the matter - but honestly this attitude is something I see recurring within this forum, not just in individuals but within the community, even myself sometimes, and we all need to grow up and just learn to admit we're wrong, and apologize sometimes, and doing this would be a pretty decent step forward in that regard.
So, seriously, step up and be the first. God knows it might start a trend of people apologizing to people they've wronged.
I'm sorry robo, I know just what you mean and I agree with you but with this specific matter I cannot apologize, even if I wanted to, cause I don't see myself doing anything wrong. I think that he said it in a cocky way, and that his "umm... yeah..." was a way of making it more clear to me that he was putting something between the lines. And that's why I called him cocky. Seriously, no one of us could know what he really meant, but I got the impression of him being a dick to me.
If he would step up and explain that this was not the case and tell me why he would say it like that, my standing point in this would of course drastically change. Until then, I won't apologize.
RE: Screenshot criticism thread - CarnivorousJelly - 08-09-2014
I was in a skype call with him when he posted that. There was absolutely no "in between the lines". It was more
Sprig: "hey, doesn't this look like the study? <link to your pic>"
Endo and pretty much everyone else: "Yeah, good point, it does!"
Sprig: "I'm writing a critique already for the one pic, you point that out"
At which point Endo added it to his comment that he felt it looked like the study
So no, it's not an insult or challenge or an indirect jab at you.
Now then, you have a history if responding to feedback very negatively or assuming that you're being attacked (granted, no one was being very friendly over the last few pages). If you keep that up, no one's going to want to help you out.