(05-04-2015, 03:30 PM)Mudbill Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 11:55 AM)RedKnight Wrote: To be honest, Scott isn't milking the series, he doesn't do it for the money. But scott would better have real eased each installment each fucking year.

How do you know he doesn't do it for the money?
Do you think he would still do this if the first game never got any attention?

(05-04-2015, 08:46 PM)Newsman Waterpaper Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 07:50 PM)FlawlessHappiness Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 07:45 PM)Mudbill Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 05:47 PM)FlawlessHappiness Wrote: I don't see a problem in this being the final chapter. It looks completely normal, and it's really amazing how the guy have been making the games so quick, with a story that makes sense.

Well, the games aren't more than 10 lines of code though /s

I'm sure he spends most of the months between the games to work out some story.

I believe the different behaviours require a bit more than 10 lines + the extra random behaviours.

But what you said is actually what makes it good. It's very simple! The idea is simple, the gameplay is simple, yet it's both challenging, frustrating and exciting...

I admit I'm a fucking bitch when it comes actually playing the damn things, the dread and nail-biting gameplay, I cant barely play it for 3 minutes. The story is pretty interesting but I prefer if the first one was just left alone and had no ghost/paranormal shit going on just killer A.I and the decrease of sanity and upcoming madness sounds just as solid to me. Also the games are cheap but I highly doubt they just take 10 codes of line to make.

(05-04-2015, 10:27 PM)RedKnight Wrote: Let me explain what i mean by that:

I meant that he should release a installment each year. For example: fnaf 1 released in 2015, fnaf 2 in 2016, fnaf 3 in 2017 and the 4th in 2018. And he shouldn't release each installment each 3 months. That's what i meant by that.

(05-04-2015, 10:39 PM)Lazzer Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 10:27 PM)RedKnight Wrote: And he shouldn't release each installment each 3 months. That's what i meant by that.

Booooh boy, the fans would've surely wait a bit for 4th one

(05-04-2015, 10:04 PM)FlawlessHappiness Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 09:06 PM)Mudbill Wrote: On another note, does anyone know what /s means?

Didn't notice you wrote that It's so small.
Put it on a new line instead of at the end of the... whatever s stands for.

I've seen /rant and /thread, but not /s

(05-05-2015, 08:08 AM)Mudbill Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 10:04 PM)FlawlessHappiness Wrote:

(05-04-2015, 09:06 PM)Mudbill Wrote: On another note, does anyone know what /s means?

Didn't notice you wrote that It's so small.
Put it on a new line instead of at the end of the... whatever s stands for.

I've seen /rant and /thread, but not /s

/s is a more subtle way to indicate a sarcastic comment.

(05-05-2015, 06:53 PM)Mudbill Wrote: Well, it's kinda the same as /sarcasm or [/sarcasm] but being more subtle makes it better for those who understand it. I see it all over Youtube these days.

Mudbill Wrote:lol thanks obama SARCASM IM KIDDING PLS DONT KILL ME

(05-05-2015, 10:43 PM)Mudbill Wrote: Well, if I am to say something like

Mudbill Wrote:lol thanks obama SARCASM IM KIDDING PLS DONT KILL ME

I feel like it kinda ruins the joke if there ever was one.