Click on entity for message - Printable Version +- Frictional Games Forum (read-only) (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum) +-- Forum: Amnesia: The Dark Descent (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Custom Stories, TCs & Mods - Development (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-38.html) +---- Forum: Development Support (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-39.html) +---- Thread: Click on entity for message (/thread-20870.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Click on entity for message - User01 - 03-04-2013 Sorry it's just my english is not so good I have no idea if you did that Smoke sorry Thank you RE: Click on entity for message - OriginalUsername - 03-04-2013 (03-04-2013, 10:11 PM)User01 Wrote: Sorry it's just my english is not so good I didn't, I'll fix it when I'm back home RE: Click on entity for message - darksky - 03-04-2013 if i get it correctly ,he wants that after an interaction you can do the next interaction only if the message is no longer displayed your script does not have this RE: Click on entity for message - OriginalUsername - 03-04-2013 (03-04-2013, 10:13 PM)darksky Wrote: if i get it correctly ,he wants that after an interaction you can do the next interaction only if the message is no longer displayed Yeah, I just said that.. RE: Click on entity for message - darksky - 03-04-2013 yes, but when i wrote my answer your answer was not there yet User01, try it like this Code: void OnStart() RE: Click on entity for message - OriginalUsername - 03-04-2013 I just arrived home and I see it's fixed I'd just use a blockbox and place some SetEntityActive's in the script. But that's neater I think. RE: Click on entity for message - ExpectedIdentifier - 03-04-2013 Wouldn't it be MUCH simpler to do it like this? PHP Code: void function1(string &in asEntity) I think that does everything? RE: Click on entity for message - OriginalUsername - 03-05-2013 (03-04-2013, 11:16 PM)sonataarctica Wrote: Wouldn't it be MUCH simpler to do it like this? Have you tested it? RE: Click on entity for message - ExpectedIdentifier - 03-05-2013 (03-05-2013, 07:45 AM)Smoke Wrote:(03-04-2013, 11:16 PM)sonataarctica Wrote: Wouldn't it be MUCH simpler to do it like this? No I haven't but the logic makes sense and I've used something similar in a full conversion before :-) |