Absolute Wuss

[Bridge]

It's not my problem if you don't want to put in the effort. Don't you think I've already read up on the issue? I have, and I decided it has no grounds in reality. Your job as a debater is to convince me otherwise and so far you are failing miserably (if not trying can be considered failing). What the fuck is the point of debating if one of the parties is just going to suggest reading material for the other party?

Didn't I already tell you that this topic isn't open to debate? You can't debate these issues, because they're simply a matter of whether there is enough studies to support either side. No amount of rhetorics will have any influence on science. If you've read up on my proof, and I've read up on yours, then that's it. That's how far as you can get.

Notwithstanding all that it is still unsatisfying. The subject of whether God exists is also non-debatable and yet people are perfectly capable of having civil and fair debates about the issue. There are however people that do nothing but quote the Bible as proof or worse, say "I'm right because the Bible says it's so" which really is what you are doing.