Sexuality

[Your Computer]

Please point out where I have contradicted myself.

While a paradox doesn't necessarily mean a contradiction, here is nevertheless what you requested for:

Exhibit A:

Spoiler below!

No, I'm not denying them anything. A person could be both a zoophile and a homosexual. A person could have several labels. But what's important is what the person him/herself identifies with.

contradicts Exhibit B:

Spoiler below!

Basically, the zoophile CANNOT choose his/her sexuality[...]. So to answer your question, YES, we can't deny anyone any form of sexuality.

Identifying oneself with another is a conscious decision driven by choice. Potential, that is, "could"; realising just how dynamic, not static, the outcome is; as the case of "born as" is static.

I'm not a scientist so I won't speculate what causes homosexuality, but the fact is that some babies grow up to be homosexual adults and this is not their own choice. It's as simple as that. Some people are left handed, should they be denied to use their left hand when writing?

"Not their own choice" does not follow from "growing up to be a homosexual." Without any debatable science, your left-handed analogy has no bearing on homosexuality.

What they do in the privacy of their bedroom is none of my, or your, business, as long as it is consensual and everyone involved are adult humans.

No, that doesn't follow my statement at all. People having sex in public and people trespassing on private property has nothing to do with whether homosexuality should be allowed or not.

If it didn't follow from your previous statement, you would not have modified your statement to include private property owned only by the consensual, homosexual couples. After all, your previous statement allowed homosexuality so long as three conditions were met: consensus, (and therefore) choice, and not damaging to anyone. Of course, even your current statement is limited to sex, for if we were to include, say, kissing, such an act could potentially be committed within the public domain, therefore becoming other people's business.

It is totally irrelevant if homosexuality is a choice or not, it should be allowed regardless. Please enlighten me to the implications of homosexuals being born that way?

What degrees? Either homosexuality is allowed or it isn't.

You have since then modified your previous statement. This tells me you already know of the implications of your previous statement if being born a homosexual were to be the premise of your previous statement. Must i really state what i previously said against your previous statement and modify the few words required to get across what i have already gotten across?

Nevertheless, my point exactly: To what degree is homosexuality allowed? You changed your position to consensual, non-damaging sex within the couple's private homes. Do you now promote homosexuality without exceptions?