Bridge
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,971
Threads: 25
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
128
|
RE: So are we all agreed that sawing....
(08-08-2012, 04:56 PM)Robosprog Wrote: (08-08-2012, 03:34 PM)Bridge Wrote: (08-08-2012, 11:35 AM)Robosprog Wrote: (08-07-2012, 11:39 PM)Bridge Wrote: (08-07-2012, 11:22 PM)Robosprog Wrote: I wasn't talking about the material being the bull but your tissue/fat etc. I was talking about how your body water wouldn't turn to steam quickly, seems I always need to explain to you. It doesn't really matter if you're dead.
EDIT: Btw, where do you get off being so condescending? Can I not make a relevant addendum to your post without you getting defensive about it? That wasn't condescending, and nor was I defensive. You got something wrong, I corrected you, adding that I always needed to explain to you as that always seems to be the case. You don't even understand what condescending is, here let me explain it for you:
Condescending is where you act like someone is of a lesser or inferior intelligence to you, understand now? That was not what I was doing.
See, THAT was being condescending. But consider the irony of explaining what "condescending" means to someone in a condescending manner in defense to being accused of being condescending. This is an internet forum which is prone to misinterpretation, true, but you cannot blame me for interpreting "seems I always have to explain to you" as condescending, because it implies that a) this is a regular thing (one other incident, controversial at best) and b) that you are right.
Have either of us been tortured by means of a brass bull? No, so there is only speculation. If you really believe you are right and that I am wrong and want to prove it, provide evidence. If you don't want to (I wouldn't even respond), be content with pooling our observations on the topic. Besides, no part of my post was debunking your theory. I was just saying even if the person inside wouldn't be dehydrated he would suffocate because the air inside a hot enclosed object like that would be unbreathable. *FACEPALM*
First off, I was doing it as an example as you clearly did not understand what condescending talk is, so yeah. It's irony isn't relevant - nor was I defending myself, it's called explaining, and it seems you try to twist what I do, yet again, into something worthy of starting an argument over.
I wasn't talking about torture by Brass Bull, I really do have to explain this again?
I was talking about how long it takes for the water in the human body to turn to steam and evaporate and then you turn this into yet another argument because of your frustration with me or something. Can't you just not, for once, try and start an argument? It's annoying, and wastes my time as well as yours, and not to mention sends threads off topics. Guess what, you don't always get to pick the topic. First, some guy posts about how in a brass bull the water in the body would turn to steam and then you reply that the body doesn't work like that and it would take a long time. I then add to the argument, whose context is already decided, saying that the air would be unbreathable. How is that not on topic? What, you think I'm psychic, and should have sensed that you wished to change subjects? Christ.
|
|
08-08-2012, 05:39 PM |
|