Insults, arguments it's so pointless what's the point?

[Kreekakon]

I undestand you competely what you are saying here. I'm just frustrated sometimes like yesterday where Robospog and dnalange start's arguing and dnalange full conversion gets really negative feedback only that reason.. where he has couple stolen models.. it's just stupid to get all people mad just for that.

Arguing, and purposely negative feedback as a whole I'd say should very much be discouraged, but I feel that I have to point out the Mental Memorial case, and single out the reasons for that.

I disagreed with Robosporg's initial way of rating the mod before finishing it, but that's a bit beside the point here in this case. The main reason I believe people got so worked up in Mental Memorial's case was that dnalange has been very unreceptive to more negative feedback as a whole, mostly by saying that people do not understand his hard work when they've never tried making mods themselves as if it deprives them of the right to judge a mod negatively.

He also had become upset when people pointed out that there was pirated content in the mod, claiming that people were trying to "ruin" his mod by pointing such a matter out.

The case that happened in Robosporg's Eternium thread was mainly because the way dnalange was giving his criticism made it seem like it was mainly because he was upset about Robo's poor feedback to his in the first place, and many of his sentences reflect that which just makes it seem more like it was born out of spite rather than a legitimate review.

There may be misunderstandings here of course, and this is just how I interpret the events, and if anyone wants to have their say at their view of the events, they're more than welcome to.

Regardless, what does this mean? Proper feedback, and nice courteous behavior towards other mod makers is very much possible, but only if both sides are willing to maintain the positive atmosphere about it.