Updating script support, taking requests

[Tomato Cat]

I am against the integer to bool implicit conversion on the grounds of legible code. When the boolean type has been made available, it is best practice to use a boolean to represent a boolean value, rather than stick in some coercion to get around the fact that int isn't bool - especially when the language does not do this by default. Just use !=0 - it is far easier to see what is going on at a glance, and it's 3 extra characters.

I agree, as well.

But I *think* JAP was asking for something like the SetLocalVarInt function, only for booleans.