The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 906 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.2.24-0ubuntu0.18.04.17 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 906 errorHandler->error



Facebook Twitter YouTube Frictional Games | Forum | Privacy Policy | Dev Blog | Dev Wiki | Support | Gametee


Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[SPOILERS] Maybe the Ark is not a bad place to live
Omnitool Offline
Member

Posts: 63
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 3
#1
[SPOILERS] Maybe the Ark is not a bad place to live

Maybe the Ark is not such a bad option for humanity's survival.

Some things to think about:
1. It is thought that all scans stored inside the Ark are immortal, but there is no clear evidence towards that in-game. What would happen if a person inside the Ark would commit suicide or die in an accident?
A. Maybe the laws of physics inside the Ark are different, if you fall from a cliff nothing happens.
B. After you die your scan gets reinitialised and you wake up prior to the event that caused your death (like loading a save in a game).
C. The simulated person simply dies and the scan is deleted.

2. There is also the possibility that people inside the Ark get older and die just like normal people, and they can actually have children.
Think about it like in real life:
- In real life, our physical appearance information is stored in our DNA. A child's physical appearance is the result of combined DNA from both parents, and the child's counciousness is a result of the social envirnoment, education and life experience (the child also imitates the parent's personality on an involuntary, subcouncious level).
- In the ARK, people's counciousness also contains their projected physical appearance, and all this is stored in code, as digital information. When a child is born in the Ark, both his/her appearance and personality traits are a perfect result of a 50/50 combination of the parent's traits, the child's gender is random (also a 50/50 chance). Given that all people in the Ark are the world's most brilliant minds (scientists, scholars) this is not a bad thing at all!

3. The Ark is governed by a simple AI system of its own, that manages the simulated envirnoment, weather, physics and all other factors. However, the original team that developed the Ark could have total control over the system. They could expand the envirnoment as much as the storage space permits and even control the trajectory of the space probe containing the Ark, and probably even fix and maintain it in some manner!
Proof in this direction is found within the game:
- During a conversation between Simon and Catherine, he asks her what will be the first thing she will do after they launch the Ark. She replies something like: "I will deploy the solar panels, stabilise the trajectory, etc" this proves that she has total control over the space probe containing the Ark.
- During the game Simon finds numerous diagrams detailing how the Ark is built, and its specs. They show that it is equipped with a remotely controllable robotic arm. It could be used for maintanance and repairs while the Ark is floating through space, controlled from within the ark via a simulated computer terminal or even a Pilot Seat.
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2015, 03:10 PM by Omnitool.)
10-07-2015, 03:09 PM
Find


Messages In This Thread
[SPOILERS] Maybe the Ark is not a bad place to live - by Omnitool - 10-07-2015, 03:09 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)