POLITICS

[Cuyir]

Then what would you do then, eh?

If governments are so useless (while you safely type in the comfort of your home, first world problems eh?) then what's the alternative?

Give them freedom for what? To install a new government? To install a new order? You seem to be ignoring the most pervasively violent parts of a society and the people that would then use anarchy as a springboard to rule.

Again, that's a pretty big oversight.

Also, nice contradiction:

''I agree that a lot of violence would erupt out of the government abruptly retracting itself, but that's because there are so many people who are dependent on the government at this point.''

"Saying the government prevents chaos is as stupid as saying it progresses society."

Seems to me they do in at LEAST one way, according to you.

Point of the matter is that you want anarchy for anarchy's sake. For some romanticized ideal of ''freedom''. Thing is, as you've stated before, anarchy only lasts till a group comes out of it and forms a government. What then? Still haven't answered me that. All I got was ''rah rah rah government is bad, rah rah rah rah freedom and chaos is good'' and a short dose of ''fuck da police''.

And nice bastardization of my analogy.