Sexuality

[spukrian]

I realise choosing the label is not the same as being the label, hence my previous statement and why i claimed A and B were in contradiction. As for your question: No, i don't believe lying is the right thing to do.

I still don't understand in what way you think I have contradicted myself. Eh, whatever, moving on...

True, but that wasn't your original statement.

My original statement was "some babies grow up to be homosexual adults and this is not their own choice". It's NOT my problem if you deliberately misinterpret what I write.

Your correlation between being left-handed and being gay is being born with it. Even though being "left-handed" and being "right-handed" also deals with effort put towards the "skill," for being either does not imply lack of the other (and therefore neither would homosexuality imply the lack of heterosexuality),

My point, which you missed, is that left handed people DO NOT CHOOSE to be left handed. It has nothing to do with skill.

but we know use of either can be shown through science, specifically anatomy (a form of science that has no reason to support homosexuality); homosexuality cannot. If you think it can or if you think you have undeniable scientific evidence for homosexuality, you may post it. Stating that you are not a scientist and therefore seek not to speculate on the matter would be irrelevant, since you would be directing me to, at least presumably, a scientist.

I will see what I can dig up!

I am not one who likes to feign ignorance for the sake of providing the benefit of the doubt. For this reason i put a lot of thought into what i say. If someone can find something (logically) wrong with my statement, i would then be better off and better prepared for any future statements i decide to make. If you find the fact that i would prefer for you to provide better statements either annoying or a form of destructive criticism, i would say don't expect me to stop.

Oh, I think understand better how your mind works now. That was a good insight. Oh yes, I do find it a bit annoying but I never expected you to stop (why would I want you to stop?).

Two reasons: I believe in the absolute authority which declares it as such, and (therefore) it contradicts what i would coin "the law of most compatibility." This "law" i do not limit to just the physical; i also include relational, which applies likewise to heterosexuals and any other forms of sexuality. I believe following such a rationale would create better relationships overall, for things like lust would be a deviation from such a "law."

Maybe you should start questioning this authority, maybe you'll learn some new tricks.

If you don't believe in God, that is not an issue i would have to address, for without an absolute authority, "right" and "wrong" are equals. In which case, you shouldn't care whether i am for or against homosexuality.

I'd love to discuss religion and morals with you, but in another thread perhaps.

If providing a list means a more sound argument, then i probably do, but you have already stated that homosexuality should be judged under the same criteria as heterosexuality.

Good, then maybe you understand what I'm trying to say...

However, heterosexuals do not engage in homosexual acts except when they want to be homosexuals.

...but this quote just shows your flawed worldview.