Sexuality

[Your Computer]

Everyone, with few exceptions, go through a period called "puberty" where their sexuality is awakened. Everyone who goes through puberty have no choice in the matter. Those few that don't go through puberty don't have a choice either.

I agree puberty is a natural process, but i wouldn't agree that puberty dictates definitive sexuality. I would argue that puberty, if at all, would dictate sexual neutrality, for people have shown to engage in all kinds of sexuality. Due to this vast variety of sexualities, i see no logical consistency in any sexual trends to admit that any act towards a sexuality is from a process other than choice, and that nurture (including satisfaction of any degree), whether by the individual or by a third-party, would prolong this choice, causing other choices to seem not as intriguing as the current choice.

Ok, now I will try to be very explicit with what I mean:
1. No one can be both homosexual and heterosexual at the same time, a person is either one or the other. (Lets ignore bisexuals and transsexuals for now).
2. Other types of sexuality, like the "zoophilia" I mentioned earlier, are just "fetishes", or maybe it's better to call them "preferences", and any one person could have several of those.

I agree with number 1, but i would argue that a "fetish" is a sub-genre of the sexual genres, therefore making "zoophilia" a root genre and not a fetish. I would argue that the sexual genres (i.e. homosexuality, heterosexuality, etc) are generalised terms specific only when referencing the genders (and possibly species, as in bestiality). All the acts committed following from the root genre could and would then be labelled a "fetish," and any genre capable of "supporting" the fetish would have said fetish under that root genre (not restricting it to any one root genre).

Ok, let me see if I can get this straight.

Do you, or do you not, define homosexuality as "heterosexual people commiting homosexual acts"?

My definition of homosexuality is "people who feel attracted to the same biological gender".

(BTW, pun intended? )

I define homosexuality as people of any sexuality committing homosexual acts. This may include heterosexuals committing homosexual acts; homosexuals committing homosexual acts; etc. At the time the newly introduced sexual act is committed, then the individual takes on the role of the currently committed sexuality. This implies that a homosexual can therefore stop being a homosexual by committing heterosexual, or other sexual, acts.

It may be true that it is safe to assume that, until an act is otherwise committed, the individual is a heterosexual, given the inherent structure of the human body. However, this, obviously, can be (unofficially) "overruled" by the actions the individual decides to take.