Sexuality

[Your Computer]

To Your Computer:
I admire the strong use of vocabulary, it's a valuable resource when picking arguments and displaying opinions. But do you ever think you use it too strongly?

I'm not sure what you're referring to. You'll have to list these terms or phrases, or expound more on this.

No, it only "awakens" the sexuality that is already there, the sexuality was dictated much earlier.

And i argued that it is neutral.

So basically you're saying that the human body is unable to feel attraction to the same biological gender?

I've always argued that we are born with the capacity for whatever side. My statement there is that the "overruling" (note the quotations) is the unauthoritative, individual act to a sexuality other than the naturally intended result (as implied by the gender). This does not rule out the natural capacity for other sides, nor does it rule out attraction to any one individual or group.

If you want to fully understand my position, you must assume, or at least acknowledge, my premise: that we are born with the capacity for all sexualities.

That is simply untrue. So if I were a homosexual, then you are
suggesting that I would have chosen to be gay because I "overruled" my
inner design as a human? You know what, that doesn't make sense anywhere
because I don't choose who I get attracted to, it just is that way. In
case you didn't know, choice is active, you make choices in a conscious
state, and because my attraction to men is (in sake of this argument)
uncontrollable, what makes you think that it's a choice? You don't have
to actually get laid with someone to discover your sexuality.

My premise: We are born with the capacity for all sexualities. Therefore limiting the capacity to one sexuality is from choice. Therefore you (plural) "overruled" (limited) your "inner design" (or "attraction") to homosexuality. The intended, natural effect, however, was declared, or implied, by your gender.

While it is true that a person doesn't have to "get laid" to dictate their (chosen) sexuality (hence why i chose "sexual intercourse"), i would not confuse the capacity for all sexualities with the capacity for only one sexuality.