POLITICS

[Cuyir]

Anarchism exists only for a short period of time. Basically between two governments. The old government goes down > anarchism > new government created by the strongest group/s

And then that government turns out to be the same or worse.

What then?

Anarchism tends to have more scenarios that end in unnecessary strife to wind up having another government and thus having no change.

I understand that that's sometimes required but the idealism falls flat in my book. No real change, no dialog, just replace one government with another through chaos.