POLITICS

[Cuyir]

You did say that Anarchy only lasted till one of the warring groups ''won'', to which I asked, ''what then''?

You still haven't answered my question and instead told me to go to China and put words in MY mouth. There's two types of freedom: Complete and utter freedom (which is flawed because no laws can mean more ''crime'' yadda yadda) and what most first world countries call freedom (which is flawed, if we're looking at semantics). We might not have the freedom to do whatever the fuck we want but what we have we can call freedom.

Someone isn't breaking down your door to steal everything you have right now cause there's an entity that's protecting against that. Does it happen? Yep. But if there would be no order it would be common, instead of an uncommon event. And as for your comment on a ''government not producing anything'': i'd say most things we take for granted were created under governments that protect copyrights (even if copyright holders can be assholes), companies and people. If there was no structure like the government we wouldn't have most things that we have. Not to mention that governments tend to invest in businesses and technology. So a government's effect on a society is more widespread than you're willing to give them credit for.

You are pro-anarchy (or so you've told us) but anarchy lasts till a new government is formed. Soooooooooooooo what do you want? There will always be a leader (s)/ruler (s), it's how it has always worked. When you're working with a group for a project at college or with a workplace team, there's always that person that leads. There's also shared leaderships (which technically applies to most governments). Leadership isn't inherently evil and corrupt, like you're saying.

You are a stereotypical college level anarchist that screams ''FUCK THE GOVERNMENT, THE SYSTEM'S CORRUPT, FUCK IT, RAH RAH RAH'' but you don't suggest any way to make it better. You don't TRY to help in any sort of way. I've poked you numerous times to tell me what's the point of anarchism, what's the point of this and that and you've answered by spreading blame everywhere. Never once did you give me a solution, just ''FUCK THE GOVERNMENT''. We are the ones responsible for placing leaders of questionable qualities ''up there'', we are able to choose better people if we wanted to (a lot of voters don't go to primaries and the nutjobs vote for nutjobs).

I said how having a government is both good and bad and how it's possible to live in peace with a government. I've also said that MY ideal scenario is not practical because of our nature and the nature of a society. You are just spreading blame and not trying to even suggest anything just, ''NO RULERS CAUSE ALL RULERS ARE BAAAAAAAAAD'', which is a worrisome thought because not all leadership is the same. So I might be done discussing really.Unless you tell me what you want and how do you want it (society-wise), there's no reason to keep beating a zombie horse, lol.