Rapture 
 
 
		
			Posting Freak 
			
			
			
 
			
	Posts: 1,078 
	Threads: 79 
	Joined: May 2011
	
 Reputation: 
30
		
	 | 
	
		
			
Why is retexturing a object difficult 
			 
			
				I'm having to do alot of wild goose chases in this. Editing the .dds in GIMP is obviously easy, but trying to make a new entity with their respective (.dds, norm.dds, nrm.dds, .dae, .msh, .ent and .mat) files, or sometimes less if I'm lucky. 
 
For example if I wanted to re-texture a static object > debris > brick02 (Their is no .ent, .mat. dds in this folder) I would have to open up the .dae and I would find 2 possible path leads. A castlebase_stairs_worn.dds that I don't think is correct and a brick.dae which sounds more likely. So let me open that up now. I find a possibly lead that goes to a ceiling02_window.dds and that does not make much sense to me. I did some more digging around to any possible leads and I came up with garbage, so thats my problem with some of these. 
 
So after awhile of searching my computer for any word of Brick. I find and remember the ones in the entities > equipment folder. So after copying the brick folder, changing the names and .dds and anything else I need. I finally get my retextured lava brick. 
 
Only word I can find to describe this is asinine. 
 
And on to my question. 
 
(1.) Am I doing this wrong? Is their some simpler way of doing this...
			 
			
			
			
		 |  
	 
 | 
	| 09-03-2011, 01:40 PM  | 
	
		
	 | 
	
		
		Your Computer 
 
 
		
			SCAN ME! 
			
			
			
 
			
	Posts: 3,456 
	Threads: 32 
	Joined: Jul 2011
	
 Reputation: 
235
		
	 | 
	
		
			
RE: Why is retexturing a object difficult 
			 
			
				I'm not sure why ceiling02_window.dds wouldn't make any sense for a basic brick model. If you open that file, you can definitely see that it would work perfectly for a basic brick model. Nevertheless, understanding someone else's work isn't always easy; i always try to build things from scratch wherever possible if there are no other alternatives.
			 
			
			
 
			
		 |  
	 
 | 
	| 09-03-2011, 02:18 PM  | 
	
		
	 |