Yes I read that but I was responding to the fact that you said in LITERALLY THE OTHER HALF OF THAT SENTENCE "but to go out and say it scars them for life is pretty pathetic". No, it just means their brain interprets shock a different way than yours. The only reason I brought up suicide was cause it's another example of people using that mindset of "well my brain works this way so it's pathetic that not everyone else's works the same way", stop trying to look into it further. Yes, and if you actually read MY post you might have seen, again, I never accused you of saying it's unnatural to be shocked by that stuff, it may have come off that way but then I just worded it wrong. I was saying that it's dumb to think that someone is pathetic if they're affected by something like that, that includes both right when you see it and LONG TERM affects. Again, everyone's mind interprets things differently and just because someone is affected differently doesn't mean they're pathetic (note: both immediately and LONG TERM effects, that includes when they see it initially and how they're effected by it LONG TERM, I am not just talking about how they react to seeing it I am talking about how it might effect their mind LONG TERM... Am I getting my point accross this time?). You implied pretty directly that film gore and real gore are the same by using literally that exact example in one of your arguments by saying that people laugh at that sort of gore but whatever. And the only reason I brought up that story was I was trying to prove that I wasn't just doing this cause I felt like I had to defend myself, I actually just thought what you said was dumb and felt like calling you out on it.