You've killed us both

[Renegade_]

I failed to see how it does not work. Show me teh sane proof that he SHOULD to escape from teh Shadow in all endings. What the point of then of all those 3 the same endings, lol?

Because an ending needs to be plausible and fit within the previous events of a storyline. By that logic there's nothing (except of course the entire storyline) that says he SHOULD walk, so why can't he fly? The storyline tells us The Shadow is after him and/or the Orb, yet if this were true we'd see him taken by The Shadow in all endings, or in none; that he is taken in some requires a better explanation than "just because" or "who says he should?"

Sigh.
As I told you, Daniel gets killed in 1st ending, CAN'T be killed in 2nd coz he escaped and temporary escapes in 3rd (temporary coz, as the game states, you can't escape Shadow, it will took you eventually). Where is the contradiction that scratches your mind and steals your sleep? I see none.

We didn't saw him dying. All we saw is the agrippa's head in the portal and then blackness. Period.

Calling into question whether Daniel's death was actually death, is not any more helpful in this case then calling into question whether Daniel's life was actually life. We've no conclusive proof that Daniel was alive or even existed at all, perhaps the entire thing was a dream. But if you need to conjure up that sort of deus ex machina to make your explanation work, then it is a weak one.

In any event, it doesn't matter whether he died or not (let's grant you that and say he never died in any of the endings). What matters is that The Shadow 'came' for him in some endings and some not. That is the crux of the contradiction and needs to be explained.