Your opinion about Bigfoot

[Adny]

How is your thought about this legend?

Don't worry you won't be laughed at for having a certain thought or way of thinking.

LOL. Thanks for the laugh this thread brought, really needed it today.

[PutraenusAlivius]

I think that he doesn't exist. Why? Because this creature is big. Something that big can be seen with the naked eye.
EDIT:
@ferryadams10
Nice profile pic. I got a new one too.

[Deep One]

Rock Worm left too early... D:

;_________;




I wish he would come back, I miss him.

[Hunter of Shadows]

Doesn't exist, anything that big and not been spotted? Bullshit

[ferryadams10]

From Wikipedia :

The scientific community discounts the existence of Bigfoot, as there
is no evidence supporting the survival of such a large, prehistoric
ape-like creature. The evidence that does exist points more towards a
hoax or delusion than to sightings of a genuine creature.[5] In a 1996 USA Today
article, Washington State zoologist John Crane said, "There is no such
thing as Bigfoot. No data other than material that's clearly been
fabricated has ever been presented."[68]
In addition to the lack of evidence, scientists cite the fact that
Bigfoot is alleged to live in regions unusual for a large, nonhuman
primate, i.e., temperate latitudes in the northern hemisphere; all
recognized nonhuman apes are found in the tropics of Africa and Asia.

As with other proposed megafauna cryptids, climate and food supply
issues would make such a creature's survival in reported habitats
unlikely[69]
Great apes are not found in the fossil record in the Americas, and no
Bigfoot remains are known to have been found. Scientific consensus is
that the breeding population of such an animal would be so large that it
would account for many more purported sightings than currently occur,
making the existence of such an animal an almost certain impossibility.[6]
In the 1970s, when Bigfoot "experts" were frequently given high-profile
media coverage, the scientific community generally avoided lending
credence to the theories by debating them.[70]

A few scientists have been less skeptical about the claims of the existence of Sasquatch. Idaho university professor Jeffrey Meldrum characterizes the search for Sasquatch as "a valid scientific endeavor",[citation needed] and says that the fossil remains of an ancient giant ape called Gigantopithecus could turn out to be ancestors of today’s commonly known Bigfoot.[71] John Napier asserts that the scientific community's attitude towards Bigfoot stems primarily from insufficient evidence.[72] Other scientists who have shown varying degrees of interest in the legend are anthropologist David Daegling,[73] field biologist George Shaller,[68][74][75] Russell Mittermeier, Daris Swindler, Esteban Sarmiento,[76] and discredited racial anthropologist Carleton S. Coon.[77]

Jane Goodall,
in a September 27, 2002, interview on National Public Radio's "Science
Friday", expressed her ideas about the existence of Bigfoot. First
stating "I'm sure they exist", she later went on to say, chuckling,
"Well, I'm a romantic, so I always wanted them to exist", and finally:
"You know, why isn't there a body? I can't answer that, and maybe they
don't exist, but I want them to."[7]

Basically a brief summary. It burns down to this: If we've seen bigfoot, and he is real, why isn't he in a cage? The alleged animal is clearly clumsy enough to be seen. It would not be hard to find a giant, clumsy ape in an alleged habitat. We've discovered more illusive creatures.

I don't say I disagree with you, but then there's the thing.

extra-ordinary things in the Patterson Gimlin film:

#1

the creature was way to big for a man in a disguise and in that days they didn't had the video editing skills to make a good hoax like that

#2

The muscles in the neck are moving which won't appear in a suit

#3

The hands were moving and the arms of the "suit" were too long for human arms so the man if it was a man must have had huge arms to move the hands in the "suit"

#4

IF it was a suit it was a top quality one with qualities that aren't made yet as we speak

#5

The legs make as the primate walks a 52° angle, it makes a 52° angle in every single video that has been made of the primate.
EVERYWHERE where people have been filmed you'll see all humans make a 72° angle, Okay this is the only thing that might be faked in that days

#6

Hair of the creature has been found and a DNA research on it has been made with negative results on every other animal or human hair

#7

There has been many researches and nobody ever found a suit okay again, this could have been disposed.

Please proof me wrong in these 7 things, maybe we can figure something out here

---

How is your thought about this legend?

Don't worry you won't be laughed at for having a certain thought or way of thinking.

LOL. Thanks for the laugh this thread brought, really needed it today.

You're welcome.
Always feels good to put a smile on someone's face

[Ghieri]

It's easier to film a gorilla suit than a creature who otherwise has no fossil, habitual, or otherwise physical evidence to support it.

I just reviewed the footage, the ape has a distinct human swagger and it's torso area reflects into the camera. Everything else about the footage is of such poor quality that distinct features are pretty much impossible to confirm. Also, it looked like the Filmer had Parkinson's.

The people reviewing the film could have easily imagined those details.

[Macgyverthehero]

It's easier to film a gorilla suit than a creature who otherwise has no fossil, habitual, or otherwise physical evidence to support it.

I just reviewed the footage, the ape has a distinct human swagger and it's torso area reflects into the camera. Everything else about the footage is of such poor quality that distinct features are pretty much impossible to confirm. Also, it looked like the Filmer had Parkinson's.

The people reviewing the film could have easily imagined those details.

Swagging was not a thing back then... unlike today which disgusts me.

I believe that anything that has been mentioned whether it be hoax or not has existed at some point on earth, including Bigfoot.

[Kman]

Swagging was not a thing back then... unlike today which disgusts me.

YES BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T MADE IT CLEAR YOU THOUGHT THAT IN ALMOST EVERY OTHER POST YOU'VE MADE





FUCK

[failedALIAS]

Swagging was not a thing back then... unlike today which disgusts me.

I believe that anything that has been mentioned whether it be hoax or not has existed at some point on earth, including Bigfoot.

Actually, a swagger is the way one. . . You know what? Fuck explaining this shit. Eat some pine needles, you insipid fuck-knuckle.

---

Me is sorry about temper.

[Adrianis]

#1

the creature was way to big for a man in a disguise and in that days they didn't had the video editing skills to make a good hoax like that

Irrelevant, because you are not watching the video back then, you are watching the video now, and we have that technology now. The video can be A. retrospectively edited and B. made to look like it was made a while ago