Abortions based on sexual orientation

[CarnivorousJelly]

there should be just as many restrictions on abortion as there are on sexual orientation

i.e. none

This right here c:

Now excuse me while I start the popcorn machine because this thread smells like troll bait

[Kreekakon]

I wouldn't say that's a more difficult question. If the children of parents lose a limb or contract a lifelong disease, the parents won't stop loving the child. But perfectly healthy children who tell their parents that they're gay often lose their parents' love.

I meant as the question when asked to us.

I'd reckon the gay question is much easier to answer, because a lot of us are morally accepting enough (I hope) to consider homosexuality not a bad thing, and would answer that abortion for this reason is wrong right away.

But what about objective physical impairments that one is certain to put an immense strain on a child's life before birth? How would we put a stance on that?

[i3670]

Just remove sexual desires and create children in test tubes, solves everything.

[MrWhitticus]

"If you're not prepared for your child to be gay, straight, cis, trans, male, female or whatever you want them to be, you should not be having children"
-Anonymous

Thought this was relevant

[Romulator]

If abortions were performed this way, it's quite possible I wouldn't have half of the friends I have today.

[i3670]

All hail antinatalism!