SCP HAZARDOUS [Beta Testing At June 1TH!]

[plutomaniac]

Saying:

Looks awful, it's almost empty. Try adding furnitures and other entities

is considered "constructive criticism" because it includes a suggestion on how it can be improved according to the poster's opinion.

If it said:

Looks awful

with nothing else then a warning would have been given. That wasn't the case here. However, one was indeed issued for intentionally going off-topic after complaints from the topic starter.

[tezpull666]

I am very sorry. Why can't i say looks awful?

[PutraenusAlivius]

I am very sorry. Why can't i say looks awful?

That's just plain awful man. If you say that Sten's mapping is bad, try to put a reason so he can improve based on what were wrong.

[tezpull666]

I am very sorry. Why can't i say looks awful?

That's just plain awful man. If you say that Sten's mapping is bad, try to put a reason so he can improve based on what were wrong.

Oh shit, forgot it.

[Mudbill]

Alright, let's try to keep this under control. This all just seems to be misunderstandings.

Sten, I understand that you are not fluent with the English language, yeah? One thing you can do is to use Google Translate for specific words you don't know. It can help you understand what someone is trying to tell you.

You have no doubt critisism in Poland and on other forums as well, because it is everywhere. Constructive critisism is what makes people realize what there is to improve. It makes the world advance. If someone tells you what is less good AND has a suggestion for what you can do to improve it, then you shouldn't ignore it.

Posting your progress online (on any forum) is an attempt to get people to see how you've done as well as come with suggestions for improvements so that you can make it the possible best. Don't expect there to be no critisism or you will be disappointed. Good luck!

[WALP]

In my honest opinion sorting out the hate, and finding the solutions to the issues pointed out by replies should be the responsibility of the developer(s), and not the people who put give time to comment on your project. If you want to hold this off and out of your thread that is your decision, but there's a good chance you will miss out on a lot of criticism and things you might not have noticed, even if they would have been delivered to you in a rather negative tone. Now if you purely just get "it sucks", I can understand the frustration, but you can always ask "What is it about it that sucks?".

[SSEAlexander]

Stopped work for now.

---

lunch!

[tezpull666]

In my honest opinion sorting out the hate, and finding the solutions to the issues pointed out by replies should be the responsibility of the developer(s), and not the people who put give time to comment on your project. If you want to hold this off and out of your thread that is your decision, but there's a good chance you will miss out on a lot of criticism and things you might not have noticed, even if they would have been delivered to you in a rather negative tone. Now if you purely just get "it sucks", I can understand the frustration, but you can always ask "What is it about it that sucks?".

[SSEAlexander]

DnALANGE,
Can you actually have two hud scripts?
Because when im using the match script,It uses match picture but sometimes radio.
And radio sometimes pops out as radio/match.
Any way for multiple?

[DnALANGE]

Yeps.
Look carefully at my scripts AND very importend look at my MainSanityevent.cfg
There are all my "sanity events" = HUDS.
You can have how much you want.
IF you read and look carefully at my HUDS pictures.
There are not sure but, like 11 different ones. ( Cell Phones )
AND
I have the magnifierglass as well..
so yes it is possible to make more then 1 sanity events \ huds.
-
If you mean 2 huds at the zame time = NO.
You can make the 2 huds into 1 in a program like.. Paint \ photoshop etc..
Only 1 StartSanityEvent possible at the time.