PC Build [GPU]

[Red]

Sure you don't want to play graphic bombs? What do you think about The Witcher 3? For this game a GTX 760 is definitely too slow.

well, that depends on what you consider graphic bombs besides the witcher 3

I actually do not plan on playing that game actually but just out of curiosity: What would the a good example of the last games graphics wise that the 760 would handle( high settings around 50-60 fps)? One or two games as examples would be nice actually. I think bioshock: infinite will run just fine on it. And that game doesn't really have poor graphics either. so yeah.

For now ,if you have the money, get the R9 290, it's simply a better card.
Both graphics and price wise. nVidia is just overpriced and overrated, only thing how it benefits over amd, might be the techologies exclusive to it, PhysX for instance. But only rare games use it. And of course, unfortunately, developers seem to be lazy on some games, they optimize the game for nVidia primarly, thus making amd optimization less optimized. nVidia is a vicious company, they pay the game developers to do that intetionally. The company who is first or have more money, gets the better version.

[Googolplex]

PhysX also works on AMD. You just have to install it.
It's not simply a "feature". Some games require PhysX to run. But as I said, just install PhysX and enjoy.

[Yuhaney]

Works yes, with 1-10 framerate.

[Red]

No, the phys x doesn't work on Amd, but it can be installed still, the physics simulations are made on cpu instead, making it significantly slower compared to separate gpu.

But amd has counter attack: TressFx physics simulation.

[Googolplex]

But amd has counter attack: TressFx physics simulation.

Only for one game: Tomb Raider ??

[Red]

But amd has counter attack: TressFx physics simulation.

Only for one game: Tomb Raider ??

Yes, but i am positive they'll release more titles taking advantage of it in the near future.