blueberry
Senior Member
Posts: 616
Threads: 11
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
13
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
(10-05-2013, 07:35 PM)Cuyir Wrote: People are really rude with Goog
I do wonder why indeed, What the fuck has he ever done to hurt anyone?
Gimme a sex~
- Some twat 2014
|
|
10-05-2013, 09:08 PM |
|
Paddy™
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,351
Threads: 43
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
224
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
(10-05-2013, 07:18 PM)Lewk Wrote: OK.
Googolplex, while I respect your right to voice your opinion about anything you wish, and hope that it is upheld - what you just said was fucking retarded.
Hmmm, you're not quite getting the hang of this civility thing, eh?
Alrighty then, back on topic folks
|
|
10-05-2013, 09:18 PM |
|
Damascus Rose
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,107
Threads: 22
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
24
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
How was it even 'retarded'? lol.
|
|
10-05-2013, 09:34 PM |
|
Statyk
Schrödinger's Mod
Posts: 4,390
Threads: 72
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
241
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
Because his opinions didn't match Lewk's I suppose.
|
|
10-05-2013, 09:40 PM |
|
Deep One
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,150
Threads: 9
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
63
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
I thought I'd never reach a day when someone asks why people are rude to googol
(This post was last modified: 10-05-2013, 11:04 PM by Deep One.)
|
|
10-05-2013, 11:00 PM |
|
Kman
Posting Freak
Posts: 4,187
Threads: 25
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
219
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
it's bc new members haven't been around long enough to truly understand his nature
Posting Freak
|
|
10-05-2013, 11:45 PM |
|
Cuyir
Senior Member
Posts: 522
Threads: 1
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
15
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
I can see why his attitudes may rub people off the wrong way but being THAT mean to someone is a bit...uncalled for, from where i'm standing anyway.
I bother him from time to time but not in such a mean manner, lol.
|
|
10-05-2013, 11:50 PM |
|
Paddy™
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,351
Threads: 43
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
224
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
Indeed. Googolplex has the same human rights as everyone else; no one gets abused like that around these here parts without getting mod-slapped upside the boobs.
Back on topic! For real this time! XD
|
|
10-06-2013, 12:03 AM |
|
MegaScience
Member
Posts: 213
Threads: 1
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
2
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
As it seems the loading bar is actually per-file, I think it'd make sense to singular-ize (remove s from) the statement "Recovering files!" That way everyone understands the bar is file-by-file, instead of the bar counting for all files to be recovered. Maybe even a secondary bar to designate overall recovery, although that is completely optional in this case.
|
|
10-06-2013, 12:13 AM |
|
Kein
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,444
Threads: 22
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
25
|
RE: SOMA Discussion Thread
(10-05-2013, 05:32 PM)Kreekakon Wrote: Not everyone follows these types of threads to each individual post. You'll have new people finding out things which may seem obvious to other people each day.
For example, had you not brought that up, I would've guessed that that picture was concept art just like Googol did.
(10-05-2013, 06:12 PM)plutomaniac Wrote: In that case Kein is right. Someone from FG (Jens I think) had said at the time that these had nothing to do with SOMA and they were part of a project that someone else from FG was working on.
If I'm not mistaken and recall correctly, these weren't part of any project, the artist drew these quick concepts for FG as a portfolio pieces so they could see if his work fits their [design] idea.
David, was it you? Brushwork is different but these were done relatively quick I suppose.
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2013, 01:49 AM by Kein.)
|
|
10-06-2013, 01:47 AM |
|
|