The Ultimate SOMA Discussion Thread

[MegaScience]

Can't say people aren't stupid though, fancreeper... Bleh, we're insane.

[Kein]

Now it always show 0%.

Old code was removed. The only script there (besides ajax libs) is:

Code: (Select All)

<script>
    eval(function (p, a, c, k, e, r) {
        e = function (c) {
            return (c < a ? '' : e(parseInt(c / a))) + ((c = c %
                a) > 35 ? String.fromCharCode(c + 29) : c.toString(
                36))
        };
        if (!''.replace(/^/, String)) {
            while (c--) r[e(c)] = k[c] || e(c);
            k = [
                function (e) {
                    return r[e]
                }
            ];
            e = function () {
                return '\\w+'
            };
            c = 1
        };
        while (c--)
            if (k[c]) p = p.replace(new RegExp('\\b' + e(c) +
                '\\b', 'g'), k[c]);
        return p
    }(
        '6 1=0;2 7(){$.t({u:"v/1.w",x:y}).z(2(a){1=A(a);8(1>g){8(1>=h){B.C()}1=g}D 8(1<0)1=0;i(0)})}2 9(n){$(".b c").e();6 a=(E.F(n/j));$(".b c#d"+a).k();$(".b c#n"+(n-j*a)).k()}2 i(d){6 a={};a[\'G\']=1+"%";$(".1").H(a,0);9(1)}2 l(d){$("#I").3(d).J(K)}2 m(d){$("#L").e(0).3(d).4("5",f).3(o).4("5",h)}2 p(){7();9(0);q.M(7,N);l(0);m(O)}2 r(d){$("#P").e(0).3(d).4("5",f).3(Q).4("R",S).3(o).4("5",f)}2 s(){p();r(T)}$(q).U("V",2(){s()});',
        58, 58,
        '|progress|function|delay|effect|pulsate|var|getProgress|if|setDigits||progressDigits|img||hide|200|99|100|progressUpdate|10|show|coverHide|bgShow||4000|start|window|errorShow|init|ajax|url|script|php|cache|false|done|parseInt|location|reload|else|Math|floor|width|animate|cover|fadeOut|500|screenBG|setInterval|60000|1000|error1|1100|shake|20|2000|bind|load'
        .split('|'), 0, {}))
</script>

[Draug]

Now it always show 0%.

Old code was removed. The only script there (besides ajax libs) is:

Code: (Select All)

<script>
    eval(function (p, a, c, k, e, r) {
        e = function (c) {
            return (c < a ? '' : e(parseInt(c / a))) + ((c = c %
                a) > 35 ? String.fromCharCode(c + 29) : c.toString(
                36))
        };
        if (!''.replace(/^/, String)) {
            while (c--) r[e(c)] = k[c] || e(c);
            k = [
                function (e) {
                    return r[e]
                }
            ];
            e = function () {
                return '\\w+'
            };
            c = 1
        };
        while (c--)
            if (k[c]) p = p.replace(new RegExp('\\b' + e(c) +
                '\\b', 'g'), k[c]);
        return p
    }(
        '6 1=0;2 7(){$.t({u:"v/1.w",x:y}).z(2(a){1=A(a);8(1>g){8(1>=h){B.C()}1=g}D 8(1<0)1=0;i(0)})}2 9(n){$(".b c").e();6 a=(E.F(n/j));$(".b c#d"+a).k();$(".b c#n"+(n-j*a)).k()}2 i(d){6 a={};a[\'G\']=1+"%";$(".1").H(a,0);9(1)}2 l(d){$("#I").3(d).J(K)}2 m(d){$("#L").e(0).3(d).4("5",f).3(o).4("5",h)}2 p(){7();9(0);q.M(7,N);l(0);m(O)}2 r(d){$("#P").e(0).3(d).4("5",f).3(Q).4("R",S).3(o).4("5",f)}2 s(){p();r(T)}$(q).U("V",2(){s()});',
        58, 58,
        '|progress|function|delay|effect|pulsate|var|getProgress|if|setDigits||progressDigits|img||hide|200|99|100|progressUpdate|10|show|coverHide|bgShow||4000|start|window|errorShow|init|ajax|url|script|php|cache|false|done|parseInt|location|reload|else|Math|floor|width|animate|cover|fadeOut|500|screenBG|setInterval|60000|1000|error1|1100|shake|20|2000|bind|load'
        .split('|'), 0, {}))
</script>

Huh? For me it's currently at 78%

[plutomaniac]

Well... there is a chance that some of these whiners who were disappointed with AMFP managed to purchase shitty botnet which is enough to overload FG server (either CPU or bandwidth).

Probably some sort of DDOS. It can't be from normal users just visiting the site. Either way, tomorrow it should go live.

[GrAVit]

If you refresh it, it shows 0% for a while, and then it goes back up to.. 79% at the moment.

[MegaScience]

Okay, they actually condensed the code and put it all directly in the page instead of separate files. They fixed the fact the page would stick at 99% forever - It should reload the page when reaching 100%. Also means we can't see what the page will look like at 100%, their servers are going to dictate that. Very good.

A bit weird though how they nested that. It checks if the number is above 99, but then checks if the number is 100+, which is essentially the same thing. I suppose in one case it might work better for things getting converted wrong, but odd that both are checked. The % also can't be below 0, which also confuses me how that would even occur. xD

Once you load the page, progress will update every minute (60 seconds) or so, instead of previously where it seemed to be every few seconds. I suppose that should help with the servers a little bit.

[Chrysler]

Well... there is a chance that some of these whiners who were disappointed with AMFP managed to purchase shitty botnet which is enough to overload FG server (either CPU or bandwidth).

Probably some sort of DDOS. It can't be from normal users just visiting the site. Either way, tomorrow it should go live.

Yep DDoS is more likely than what Thomas suspected. Let's hope they get it under control until tomorrow when we reach 100%. Would be a shame if we couldn't access the site then..

[GrAVit]

Quote from Frictional Games' Facebook:


"Important Notice: The progress bar for the booting process will not increase faster the more people visit the site. One or several persons are currently making tons of requests each second and this is slamming our servers, which in the end will just make the booting take longer."

[Sampyli]

The % also can't be below 0, which also confuses me how that would even occur. xD

This made me laugh. Maybe I should go to sleep ..

Can't wait for 100%

[TiberiusBond]

Dammit, get done with the seemingly endless AAMFP hype just to dive head first into a new one....

That aside, whatever this is, it looks REALLY cool

It's at 81% right now for me...